TANA, the prestigious Telugu Association in the USA, once a symbol of pride and identity led by stalwarts, has recently found itself embroiled in multiple controversies.
From alleged misappropriation of funds by a key figure to ongoing internal rifts and groupism, the image of this renowned nonprofit organization has taken a serious hit.
Now, another concern is raising eyebrows — and legal questions.
As per democratic norms and what is generally understood as the legal process, the outgoing body must step down and a new team should be elected through transparent elections.
However, in a surprising move, a three-member Selection Committee has been formed to "select" the new Board of Directors, Executive Committee, and office bearers — bypassing the standard election procedure. This has sparked widespread outrage and confusion.
Though there’s some dispute about the exact number, TANA reportedly has around 70,000 registered members. How can such a large body skip elections?
Sources say that once it was known a Selection Committee was in charge, many chose not to nominate themselves, believing the outcome was already predetermined.
As a result, almost every position — close to 40 in number — has only one nominee, paving the way for unanimous selection.
Notably, the Board of Directors requires five members, yet six names have been submitted — suggesting that one candidate from outside the "favored group" entered the race, despite knowing defeat was certain.
A similar case is seen with the Executive Vice President role, which has two contenders. All other posts are uncontested.
The big question many are now asking- Is this legal? Could TANA face legal trouble for skipping an election process that should be democratic and inclusive?
Only legal experts — and the current Selection Committee — can clarify and reassure the organization's thousands of members.
