Pawan Kalyan has consistently portrayed himself as a leader who raises his voice against injustice. He often speaks about fighting oppression and standing with those who are wronged.
However, his silence over the controversy surrounding Jana Nayagan has sparked widespread discussion and criticism.
The film stars Vijay, the Tamil actor turned politician who is known to admire Pawan Kalyan and has remade several of his films in the past.
Now, Jana Nayagan is facing obstacles in its release, with claims that the film and its makers were troubled due to Vijay’s political entry. Many see this as a clear case of injustice and political pressure.
This situation has raised serious questions among the public. Why should a film’s release be stopped? Why should filmmakers be harassed for their work?
More importantly, does this indicate that the only way to avoid such trouble is by aligning with the ruling powers?
What stands out is Pawan Kalyan’s complete silence on the issue. He is part of an alliance government in which the BJP is also a key partner.
Because of this, many feel that he is choosing not to speak up when injustice appears to come from within his own political circle.
Netizens are now openly questioning whether Pawan Kalyan’s stand against injustice is truly principled or selective.
His silence on Jana Nayagan has turned into a larger debate about consistency, moral courage and whether his activism depends on political convenience rather than conviction.
