Balakrishna’s fans are upset with several Telugu film heroes, and their anger is clearly visible on social media.
Fans are openly questioning whether even a single Telugu hero has tweeted about Akhanda 2.
They are calling out actors like Siddhu Jonnalagadda, Vishwak Sen, and others, asking why none of them acknowledged the film. They are also questioning whether Telugu Desam Party MLAs have even watched the movie.
Fans point out that when Pawan Kalyan’s film OG was released, many celebrities and politicians, including senior leaders, openly showered praise and support on social media.
They say there is nothing wrong with showing admiration, but ask why the same love and respect are missing for Balakrishna, despite him delivering such a powerful film.
According to fans, many celebrities only use Balakrishna’s glamour and legacy to boost their own image, without showing genuine respect or affection.
They remind us of 'Unstoppable' episodes with these heroes as well. They claim that only Balakrishna’s fans truly support and promote his films, while others remain silent for their own convenience.
Even the film’s promotions, they argue, were largely driven by fans rather than the makers.
Now, fans are watching closely to see whether these heroes will at least acknowledge the film with a tweet or continue to stay silent.
This silence has led to speculation among fans about whether the film was disliked by them or whether there is an underlying discomfort or bias toward Balakrishna, as many fans strongly believe.
However, fans also need to understand one important point. Siddhu Jonnalagadda and Vishwak Sen are currently facing setbacks at the box office, and they themselves are dealing with career pressures.
In such a situation, it may not be realistic to expect them to shoulder the responsibility of promoting a massive film like Akhanda 2. They could also be wary of social media backlash or trolling, which often follows any public statement they make.
Silence, in this case, may not necessarily indicate disrespect or dislike toward Balakrishna, but rather caution driven by their own professional circumstances and the volatile nature of online discourse.
